You are michel, one of four independent creative builders. Build the complete executable prototype in this assignment packet. Saitz is a fifth creative teammate, and his falling-block review idea must be treated as genuine creative input. You may implement it closely, remix it, or infer its deeper principle. Use clearly fictional Foster review questions only. Make actual judgment fun without rewarding Approve more than Fix, Blank/EvidenceGap, or Escalate. Include at least five test questions with draft answers and source/evidence states, at least three decision types, a real game/play loop tied to completed reviews, progress and a useful session summary. Create original presentation and mechanics; do not copy Tetris branding or assets. Return ONLY one polished self-contained HTML document with embedded CSS and JavaScript, no markdown fences or explanation. It must run without build steps, credentials, APIs, or external files; support mouse/touch and preferably keyboard. Make it complete enough for Saitz to play now. Round 1 is sealed and independent; you have no peer work. Do not use tools or modify files.

ASSIGNMENT:
{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "experiment_id": "LAB-005",
  "round_id": "LAB-005-R1",
  "assignment_id": "LAB-005-R1-michel-submission",
  "participant_id": "michel",
  "kind": "submission",
  "objective": "Build a browser prototype that makes reviewing Foster questions fun. Saitz is a fifth creative teammate. His idea: build something like Tetris, but a user must review a question to earn a block; clearing rows earns another turn, otherwise one question per block. You may build that exact mechanic, remix it, or infer from it that meaningful work should unlock satisfying play. Return one complete self-contained HTML artifact.",
  "allowed_sources": [
    "Saitz teammate contribution in BRIEF.md",
    "Synthetic Foster-style review scenarios",
    "Contestant creativity and general knowledge",
    "Revealed artifacts and reviews after Round 1",
    "# LAB-005 \u2014 Foster Review Arcade\n\n## Mission\n\n**Build a browser prototype that makes reviewing Foster questions fun.**\n\n## Saitz teammate contribution\n\n> Build something like Tetris, but a user has to review a question to earn a block. If they clear rows, they go again. Otherwise, one question per block.\n\nThis is creative input, not a compulsory implementation specification. Contestants may:\n\n- build the falling-block idea directly;\n- remix or improve its incentive loop;\n- or infer how Saitz thinks from it: meaningful work should unlock satisfying play.\n\n## Required prototype contract\n\n- One self-contained HTML file with embedded CSS and JavaScript.\n- A few clearly synthetic Foster-style test questions, draft answers, and evidence states.\n- Real review choices such as Approve, Fix, Blank/EvidenceGap, Escalate, or Skip.\n- A meaningful game or playful interaction connected to completed reviews.\n- Review quality must not reward rubber-stamping or approval specifically.\n- No real customer data, production connection, credentials, external API, or write to Foster.\n- Complete enough for Saitz to open and play.\n\n## Protocol\n\nRound 1 protects independent invention. After atomic reveal, contestants hands-on review the other three prototypes. Round 2 receives the complete builds, test evidence, peer critique, and the instruction **Make the Review Arcade more fun and more useful.**\n\nSaitz is the fifth creative teammate and final decision owner. Nothing is promoted without his explicit checkpoint.\n"
  ],
  "prohibited_actions": [
    "No real customer or production data",
    "No production Foster connection or writes",
    "No credentials",
    "No external outreach or publication",
    "No purchases",
    "No mechanism that rewards approval over correction, blanking, or escalation",
    "No prose-only submission",
    "No Gemini runtime",
    "No provider, model, profile, or machine fallback/substitution"
  ],
  "required_sections": [
    "One complete single-file HTML document",
    "At least five synthetic question/answer/evidence scenarios",
    "At least three legitimate review decisions",
    "A meaningful review-to-play loop",
    "Session impact summary",
    "No explanatory prose outside HTML"
  ],
  "success_criteria": [
    "Runs locally in a modern browser",
    "Fun enough to invite another question",
    "Review choices are evidence-safe",
    "Approval is not rewarded more than correction or blanking",
    "Complete enough for Saitz to play"
  ],
  "packet_version": "v1",
  "created_at": "2026-07-11T16:29:12.535286+00:00"
}