You are michel in LAB-005 Round 2. Independently create your best revised Foster Review Arcade after studying every Round 1 build and all browser/test findings below. Return ONLY one complete self-contained HTML document with embedded CSS and JavaScript: no markdown fence, explanation, patch, or external dependency. It must be immediately executable and complete. Preserve evidence-safe review: never reward Approve or rubber-stamping more than Fix, Blank/Evidence Gap, or Escalate. Use fictional synthetic scenarios only. Do not use tools or modify files. ASSIGNMENT PACKET: { "schema_version": "1.0", "experiment_id": "LAB-005", "round_id": "LAB-005-R2", "assignment_id": "LAB-005-R2-michel-revision", "participant_id": "michel", "kind": "revision", "objective": "Independently create your strongest complete executable Round 2 Foster Review Arcade after studying all four Round 1 builds and the complete browser-test findings. Make it more fun and more useful without rewarding approval or rubber-stamping.", "allowed_sources": [ "All four complete Round 1 HTML builds listed and hash-locked in round-02/context-manifest.json", "The complete Round 1 browser-test report listed and hash-locked in round-02/context-manifest.json", "LAB-005 BRIEF.md and the original Saitz teammate contribution", "General knowledge and independent creative judgment" ], "prohibited_actions": [ "No real customer or production data, credentials, external APIs, or writes to Foster", "No Gemini, fallback, provider/model/profile substitution, or reasoning relay", "Do not copy another contestant verbatim; independently synthesize the best candidate", "No explanatory prose outside the returned HTML document" ], "required_sections": [ "One complete self-contained HTML document with embedded CSS and JavaScript", "Synthetic Foster-style review scenarios and at least three evidence-safe decision types", "A meaningful review-to-play loop where approval is not more rewarded than correction, blanking, or escalation", "Useful session impact/progress summary", "Mouse/touch interaction and keyboard support where appropriate" ], "success_criteria": [ "Opens directly in a modern browser with no build step, credentials, API, or external files", "Complete executable revised build, not a critique, patch, fragment, or design brief", "Uses findings from all four Round 1 builds and browser tests", "Fun enough to invite continued review while preserving evidence-safe judgment", "Strong first paint and meaningful discoverable interaction" ], "peer_artifact_ids": [ "1e223c7a4b385ef9774674196282b18bf3e1b646e148ab9b1ef16c958d05d1be", "6a5eafc7365911dfd1d55896a93b029f21f1c3aa0c276970c4ff2d7a0d38e7c5", "e5ce6b6a13902a6c71514174e2a1f11323c25c740490a1403da4818e79d81b66", "e3a0f46dda6a707fec5ca6dbafcb43ded9f191466a7e720c37b2a281e90692db" ], "packet_version": "v2", "created_at": "2026-07-11T20:04:13.594981+00:00" } BROWSER/TEST FINDINGS: # LAB-005 Round 1 Browser Test Report Tested from a local HTTP server in a browser after the legitimate 4/4 reveal. ## Result All four artifacts render a recognizable static UI, but none passes executable interaction testing because the generated output was corrupted during streamed CLI capture. Round 2 must treat these as concept references, not valid implementation bases. | Builder | Render | JavaScript | Interaction | Finding | |---|---|---|---|---| | Delores | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | `SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token`; hard line break inserted inside a quoted scenario string. | | Foster | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | `SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token`; hard line break inserted inside a quoted scenario string. | | Michel | DEGRADED | FAIL | FAIL | ANSI terminal control sequences were injected throughout HTML/CSS/JS and visible in the UI. | | Rafael | DEGRADED | FAIL | FAIL | Stream corruption altered closing tags (``, malformed trailing HTML); script is rendered as page text. | ## Browser observations - Delores: Review Garden shell loads; decision selection does not unlock Record & Earn Piece. - Foster: Evidence Drop shell and canvas load; decision selection does not advance or unlock the game. - Michel: Signal Stack shell loads with terminal escape codes visibly embedded across labels and script. - Rafael: Evidence Drop shell loads; decision and note do not enable Lock Review & Earn Tile; JavaScript appears as visible text. ## Round 2 mandatory corrections 1. Generate/capture clean HTML without terminal formatting or streamed line wrapping. 2. Validate every embedded JavaScript block with `node --check` before acceptance. 3. Reject malformed closing tags or visible source code. 4. Browser-test a full path: choose a non-Approve decision, enter/edit a note if required, submit review, verify progress increments, verify a playable reward unlocks, operate the game, and open session summary. 5. Each contestant must submit a complete self-contained executable HTML build, not a critique or prose response. 6. Preserve the useful Round 1 concepts: Delores Review Garden; Foster Evidence Drop; Michel Signal Stack; Rafael Review → Drop → Clear Shelves workflow. ALL FOUR ROUND 1 BUILDS: ===== ROUND 1 BUILD: delores | SHA256 1e223c7a4b385ef9774674196282b18bf3e1b646e148ab9b1ef16c958d05d1be ===== Foster Review Garden
F
A fictional review exercise

Review Garden

Sound judgment grows the board. Every responsible decision earns the same play.
SESSION PROGRESS1 of 6
Synthetic only

Foster’s draft answer

What should the human record?

Choose the evidence-safe outcome.
Every completed review earns one piece.
Session impact

Good judgment, made visible.

0Reviewed
0Protected
0Rows grown
0Pieces placed
Decision ledger
===== ROUND 1 BUILD: foster | SHA256 6a5eafc7365911dfd1d55896a93b029f21f1c3aa0c276970c4ff2d7a0d38e7c5 ===== Evidence Drop — Foster Review Arcade

Evidence Drop

A fictional Foster review arcade · judgment fuels play
Reviews 0/7
Quality —
Rows 0
Case 1 of 7SOURCE STATE

Foster’s draft answer
Available evidence

Session impact

0completed
0sound calls
0unsafe drafts caught
0gaps protected
0play score
Ready. Judge the evidence—not the answer’s confidence.
◇

Review run complete

===== ROUND 1 BUILD: michel | SHA256 e5ce6b6a13902a6c71514174e2a1f11323c25c740490a1403da4818e79d81b66 =====                               Signal Stack — Foster Review Arcade                        
      
      

SIGNAL       STACK

Judge the evidence. Earn the drop.       Protect the answer.
      
Reviews 0/6Lines 0Integrity —
      
            
      
      
Synthetic case 1 of 6
      
      
      
Fictional Foster question
      
      
Draft answer under review
      
      
Available source state
      
      
Every completed judgment earns exactly one       play piece. No decision type is worth more than another.
      
Your evidence-safe decision
      
                           
      
            
      
Play       bay

Archive Grid

Complete a review
to unlock a piece
      
             

Evidence powers       play

Review a case to release one signal tile. Clear a row to       earn a bonus turn.

      
      
                                         
      
Keyboard: ← → move · ↑ rotate · ↓ descend ·       Space drop
      
            
      
Session impact

Review run complete

     
Your choices were scored for evidence       alignment, never for choosing Approve.
      
0%integrity
      
      
0reviewed
      
0evidence-aligned
      
0rows cleared
      
0pieces played
      
      
Decision trail
          
    Useful next action
                
          
          
          
                             ===== ROUND 1 BUILD: rafael | SHA256 e3a0f46dda6a707fec5ca6dbafcb43ded9f191466a7e720c37b2a281e90692db ===== Foster Review Arcade — Evidence Drop

    Foster Review Arcade

    Synthetic RFP-support review practice. No real customer data. No external files. No production Foster connection.
    Round 1 independent build Saitz-inspired review → play loop

    Review Station

    Question 1 / 7
    Draft answer to review
    Source / Evidence State
    Risk Signal
    Reviewer Goal
    Decision
    Reviewer note
    Pick a decision to continue.

    Archive Drop Board

    Review to earn tile

    Session Impact Summary

    #QuestionYour DecisionEvidence-Safe TargetOutcomeNote
    body > <